Global Economic Slowdown Unlikely To Change Course With July Rate Cut

  • The slowdown in economic growth in the second quarter of 2019 was significant.
  • The historical parallels of similar slowdowns as well as incoming data both point to a prolonged slowdown, that is unlikely to reverse course with a 25 bps rate cut.

There are essentially two factors currently weighing on global economic growth at the moment. There is the secular narrative, and this has been a headwind for growth for some time, and there is the relatively recent political headwind that is unlikely to change course anytime soon.

Aging populations and decreased fertility rates:

Source: UN

The number of people worldwide aged 60 years or over is expected increase to 2 billion by 2050, outnumbering the number of children (0–14 years) for the first time in human history. Rapidly aging populations result in shrinking labor force growth rates, which is a headwind to economic growth.

Global debt to gdp at historically high levels:

Source: McKinsey

Global Debt to GDP levels were at elevated levels back in 2007 and a decade of monetary easing since then has resulted in significant increases in leverage ratios in the vast majority of countries, which also serves as a headwind for future economic growth.

2. Recent: Populism & Barriers to Trade:

The U.S. has been escalating tariffs against China with the intention of driving Chinese reforms around intellectual property theft and the state subsidization of private enterprise. This has had a significant impact on supply chains linking the U.S. and China, and in our interconnected global economy, has also had impacts far beyond the borders of the U.S. and China:

Source: TradingEconomics

European Manufacturing is flashing red (readings <50 imply contraction) and we’re seeing a similar downwards trend in the manufacturing PMI’s of the U.S. and China since the beginning of 2018 as well. With producer sentiment in free-fall in response to rising trade tensions, the question becomes how close are we to a resolution of the current trade disputes, such that manufacturing sentiment can recover. Given how far apart the two sides are on many of the major sticking points around a potential trade deal, it would seem we are a far ways off:

This is where we are after over a year of negotiating and round after round of tariffs. All of this has not led to anything close to a consensus on these key issues. The two sides are entrenched in their original positions and the goodwill between U.S. and Chinese leadership is eroding. The Chinese leadership is also unlikely to give the most hostile U.S. leadership its faced in recent history a big win before the 2020 elections, which makes it all the more difficult to see a path to a meaningful resolution in the near term.

We’re in a position where we have both secular trends and current events both acting as headwinds for economic growth. This dynamic had a sharp, and relatively sudden effect on economic growth in the second quarter. U.S. annualized GDP growth fell from 3.2% in Q1 2019 to 2.1% in Q2 2019. If we use history as a guide, sharp dropoffs in quarterly economic growth are often followed by subsequent quarters of anemic growth:

Source Data: Multpl

Going back to 1962, we have experienced 23 cases of a comparable dropoff in economic growth. In 21 of 23 of these instances, the 2 quarters following the dropoff in growth had lower growth rates than the two quarters leading up to the dropoff in growth, with an average decline of 2.7%. There are several potential explanations for this: economic imbalances take time to correct themselves, central bank responses to economic slowdowns are often delayed and take time to have an effect, and there’s also the behavioral element of businesses and consumers cutting investment/spending in response to headlines around slowing growth. Whatever the case may be, this trend does not bode well for economic growth in Q3 and Q4 of 2019, given the drop off experienced in the second quarter.

“If past history was all there was to the game, the richest people would be librarians” — Warren Buffett

Just because historical dropoffs in short term growth have often preceded longer term slowdowns, there’s no reason to believe that this has to be what happens over the next two quarters. However, there are very real economic imbalances that exist around the world, and these point to a prolonged slowdown being a highly likely scenario. Any period of time that has significant increases in debt ratios, such as the past decade, is likely to involve some areas of malinvestment. In the current environment, there’s a few that are quite significant:

1. Chinese Property:

Chinese construction of new property (which is heavily financed by debt) continues to outpace sales (which are also heavily financed by debt), leading to an inventory glut of unsold real estate:

Source Data: China NBS

Furthermore, marginal property development is becoming all the more unproductive as much of the new inventory coming to the market is being left unoccupied and is nothing more than a object for speculation, in a region with few alternatives for capital investment:

Source: Bloomberg

Floor space of real estate sold in China has been a great leading indicator for the direction of industrial growth and commodity prices globally over the past decade, due to the size and significance of the Chinese property market. This metric has began to turn negative recently due to trade war pessimism and government controls around property speculation, both of which are unlikely to subside in the near term:

Source Data: China NBS

This does not bode well for commodity prices and industrial growth in the near term.

2. ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy)

With Japan and much of Europe already holding interest rates around 0 in response to anemic growth over the past decade, there is limited firepower left in the monetary toolbox to get these economies out of the funk they’ve been in. Europe’s largest banks are trading significantly below book value, at multi-year lows, which shows what the market thinks about the health and viability of these banks in a zero interest rate environment. With no hurdle rate to investment, the quality of lending inevitably deteriorates. That should intuitively make sense, but if it doesn’t, Deutsche’s equity looks extremely attractive at 23 cents on the dollar of its balance sheet book value. This is not how banks are valued in a balanced economic environment:


Global growth experienced a significant slowdown in the second quarter and historical parallels point to slower growth ahead. Globally, business sentiment and corporate profits are down year over year. This is not the result of a shortage of low cost financing options, but rather, rising trade tensions and economic imbalances that have built up over an extended period of time. This dynamic makes any marginal monetary easing less effective in stimulating growth, and as a result, investors should be prepared for a longer term slowdown. Treasuries will likely continue to perform well in this low growth, low inflation environment that we’re stuck in for the time being, and with the slowdown impacting the commodity intensive Chinese property sector, industrial metals will likely continue to under perform.




Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Chartered Banks Saw a Surge in Uninsured Mortgage Origination in Q3: CMHC

KBKG Tax Insight: Minnesota Introduces an Alternative Simplified R&D Tax Credit

Not-for-Profit vs Nonprofit: What is the difference?

Not-for-profit vs Nonprofit: What is the difference? -

Ongoing tensions between the US and China forecast an uncertain future

Mortgage And Refinance Rates, June 3

The Macroeconomy, Where We Are and Where We’re Going

John McAfee versus Tax

Theresa May Vows to be More Flexible, BoJ Decides on Policy

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store


More from Medium

Never heard of The Misery Index before?

Tech Policy Issues to Watch in Brussels and Washington

The Echo Chamber IRL

The coming collapse of the US Economy